← All selected work
CASE 03 / Product pilot

Toast Tables ticketing: getting a presale ready to launch

Buyer checks, launch coordination and a workable plan for arrivals at the door.

MY ROLE
Restaurant operator and external customer
STATUS
Presale launched; live-event results pending
PERIOD
October 2026
DELIVERED

A paid-ticket presale launched after buyer checks and controlled name-based admission testing.

EVIDENCE LIMIT

A launched presale does not establish paid sales, conversion or live admission performance. Event-day results remain pending at this October 2026 checkpoint.

THE PROBLEM

I’m thinking about the person at the door.

I look at ticketing from both ends: the guest buying a ticket and the team admitting them. The page needs to be clear, the checkout needs to make sense and the door team needs a workable way to handle people arriving separately. The equipment we actually have matters, too.

MY ROLE

What I owned.

I worked through launch requirements with the product and support teams, checked the buyer experience and tested name check-in. I kept track of the questions we still needed to answer before the event. This was hands-on testing and launch coordination from the restaurant side.

DECISIONS & TRADE-OFFS

Where I used judgment.

01

Launch what was ready

Proceed with a paid presale while keeping controlled test bookings separate from the selling event.

02

Test an ordinary guest exception

Use a controlled booking to check a group arriving separately and the remaining admission state.

03

Check the operating fallback

Keep an admission plan matched to the equipment and verified checks. A controlled check is separate from live event performance.

PEOPLE & DEPENDENCIES

Who had to be in the loop.

I coordinated restaurant-side requirements with product and support, checked buyer information and pricing, and tested name-based admission. The door workflow and available equipment were dependencies, not details to leave until event day.

DECISION BRIEF / SANITIZED RECONSTRUCTION

Get the presale open.
Keep the door plan honest.

My restaurant-side priority was a usable paid-ticket launch. I separated buyer checks, controlled admission and the live event instead of treating them as one milestone.

Buyer experience
Reviewed pricing at multiple quantities. Those checks were not evidence of paid sales.
Ordinary exception
Tested a group arriving separately by name. Kept test bookings separate from the paid-ticket event.
Equipment dependency
Matched the plan to available equipment and a controlled name-based path. Other admission checks remained separate.
Launch decision
Presale launched. Live admission, staff friction and event reconciliation still needed the actual event.
Ownership: I coordinated requirements and readiness from the venue side. Product/support owned product answers; venue staff still had to execute and assess admission.
THE OUTPUT

What was actually delivered.

  • A launched paid-ticket presale, kept separate from controlled test bookings.
  • Buyer-price review and controlled split-arrival admission checks.
  • A readiness record separating completed checks from equipment and live-event follow-up.
NEXT PROOF POINT

What remains to demonstrate.

After the event, reconcile actual admissions, staff observations and guest friction. Verify any untested admission path separately.

The little handoffs deserve attention. What a guest buys has to line up with what the door team sees and what the equipment can do. That is where I spend time testing.

NEXT CASE / 04

AI-assisted restaurant scheduling ↗